This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Reading coff-pe-read files
- From: Kai Tietz <Kai dot Tietz at onevision dot com>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:37:38 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch] Reading coff-pe-read files
Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote on 08.01.2009 14:09:04:
> > > > > 2009-01-08 Kai Tietz <kai.tietz@onevision.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > * coff-pe-read.c (read_pe_exported_syms): Enable read of
PE+
> > > > > export directory.
> >
> > Approved.
>
> Actually, the compiler just spotted a couple of syntax errors.
> GASP! We should have both been more careful.
> Can you please fix them before checking in?
>
> > - if ((strcmp (target, "pe-i386") != 0) && (strcmp (target, "pei-
> i386") != 0))
> > + is_pe64 = ((strcmp (target, "pe-x86-64") == 0)
> > + || ((strcmp (target, "pei-x86-64") == 0));
> ^^ One '(' too many here.
>
> Also, I can never determine in diffs whether the weird formatting
> is because of tabs or because it is wrong. But in this case,
> the "||" is put at the wrong location. I know it looks nicer if
> the two strcmp expressions are aligned, but any formatter will
> destroy that, and we do use GNU indent once in a while. So let's
> be consistent and format the above as follow:
>
> > + is_pe64 = ((strcmp (target, "pe-x86-64") == 0)
> > + || ((strcmp (target, "pei-x86-64") == 0));
>
> Same for is_pe32.
>
> > + if (is_pe64)
> > + num_entries = pe_get32 (dll, opthdr_ofs + 108;
> ^^
> missing ')' here.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Joel
>
I corrected it in my patch.
Sorry,
Kai
| (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny
| (='.'=) into your signature to help him gain
| (")_(") world domination.