This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] convert a host address to a string
- From: Kai Tietz <Kai dot Tietz at onevision dot com>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:04:51 +0100
- Subject: Re: [RFC] convert a host address to a string
Joel,
Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote on 09.01.2009 10:57:05:
> Kai,
>
> > > > Please be aware that %llx isn't valid for x86_64 windows (as it
isn't
> > for
> > > > 32-bit standard). The options 'I' or 'I64' have to be used for
> > > > those targets (at least for _WIN64).
> > >
> > > Are you serious? Wow, that's unbelievable. %llx is defined by ISO
> > > C99, and you're saying that even the 64-bit editions of Windows that
> > > were introduced several years after the standard was ratified (and
> > > almost a decade after the first drafts were circulated) don't
> > > implement that bit of the standard?
> > >
> >
> > Sadly, yes. IIRC they implemented it in their newer runtimes, but it
> > didn't made it into msvcrt.dll even on 64-bit systems.
>
> I don't doubt that you are right, but I was wondering whether configure
> was (apparently incorrectly) defining PRINTF_HAS_LONG_LONG.
>
> | #include <stdio.h>
> |
> | int
> | main (void)
> | {
> | long long addr = 0xdeadbeeffeedfaceLL;
> |
> | printf ("addr = 0x%llx.\n", addr);
> | return 0;
> | }
>
> I compiled the program above on our x86_64 Vista, and it compiled and
> worked like a charm. The check in configure is actually of the same
> nature.
>
> On 32bit systems:
> - XP: PRINTF_HAS_LONG_LONG is not defined.
> - Vista: All works fine.
>
> I don't have access to an x86_64 XP install, but I'm going to make
> a guess that PRINTF_HAS_LONG_LONG is not defined there.
>
> What I will do is send a patch that implements what Mark suggested.
> This should work on all our supported platforms, with the addition
> of x86_64 Vista, but to the exclusion of x86_64 XP. I am OK with
> the idea of adding a extra #if WIN64_ branch that allows us to build
> on x86_64 XP, but you'll have to convince others as well.
That makes sense. I use at work XP64, and there is for sure no '%llx'
support. I will cross check this this evening at home on Vista64.
The bad thing here is if you would enable -Wformat, you get by gcc a
warning about the double-(el)l ...
Cheers,
Kai
| (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny
| (='.'=) into your signature to help him gain
| (")_(") world domination.