This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [0/2] Inspect extra signal information
- From: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- To: pedro at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, eliz at gnu dot org, mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:46:31 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: [0/2] Inspect extra signal information
- References: <200901121846.51709.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200901131937.26135.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200901131946.44072.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200902021442.00407.pedro@codesourcery.com>
> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:42:00 +0000
>
> Hi guys, I'm looking at this again.
>
> Given the argument that with this patch, the siginfo_t type before the signal
> is delivered is the the same as what is seen on the signal handler, when
> the signal is delivered to the inferior inferior, do you still think I
> should change the type, or are you OK with how things are?
I have no real issues with using the obfuscated type names. Just
thought it was a bit ugly and thought users might prefer the
unobfuscated names. But since I don't use Linux all that much, I
don't really care.