This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: [RFA] fix *stopped for CLI commands

From: "Marc Khouzam" <marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com>
To: "Vladimir Prus" <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: <gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com>, "Nick Roberts" <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:07:01 -0500
Subject: RE: [RFA] fix *stopped for CLI commands
References: <200902061045.18508.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA06E84D64@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <200902102358.11736.vladimir@codesourcery.com>

 

> From: Vladimir Prus
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:58 PM
> 
> Why does DSF use tokens at all? I probably can fix this up, but I am
> not sure the tokens are really necessary. Does anybody envision a case
> where GDB would report command results out-of-order?

We used tokens from the very start.  CDI uses them too, I believe.
I'm not sure if tokens are really nessary, but it is probably a little
risky to suddenly move away from them.

Marc

References:
- [RFA] fix *stopped for CLI commands
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- RE: [RFA] fix *stopped for CLI commands
  - From: Marc Khouzam
- Re: [RFA] fix *stopped for CLI commands
  - From: Vladimir Prus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]