This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Special casing dtors?

>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> writes:

Pedro> With stabs?  FSF GDB?  I *do* see that with dwarf.  I'll see if I
Pedro> can try this on x86-cygwin, which is currently still using
Pedro> gcc-3.4/stabs by default.

Keith> BTW, I ran the testsuite on x86 and x86_64 w/stabs (again, using the
Keith> F10 compiler), and the summaries are absolutely identical (timestamp
Keith> excepted): the patch has no effect.

I tried this on x86 F9 using -gstabs+ and those tests pass for me as well.
I used the system gcc (4.3 based).

At this point I would assume the discrepancy is due to compiler
differences.

Tom
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]