Re: [patch] Set calling convention of methods

[Jonas Maebe <jonas dot maebe at elis dot ugent dot be>]

Sorry for the late reply, I was on holidays.


On 10 Apr 2009, at 19:32, Tom Tromey wrote:

> > > > > > "Jonas" == Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe@elis.ugent.be> writes:
>
> Jonas> In attachment is my patch to set the calling convention for  
> methods.
>
> Do you have a copyright assignment on file?

Not yet. I'm in the final stage of getting the waiver from my employer  
to send it to FSF though.

> Jonas> Since the calling convention cannot be defined using stabs,  
> I've
> Jonas> hardcoded "0" there (which means that nothing changes  
> compared to the
> Jonas> past). Maybe that should rather be some constant? If so,  
> where should
> Jonas> it be defined?
>
> Yeah, this is a bit gross.  AFAICT the calling convention field only
> takes values from dwarf.  So, I suppose the question is how you plan
> to use this information in later patches.  If you check the calling
> convention in general code then I suppose we will need some generic
> set of values here.

It is already used in general code (well, in non-DWARF-specific code),  
see the use of DW_CC_GNU_renesas_sh in sh-tdep.c

> Other than this issue, this looks reasonable to me.

Thanks.


Jonas