This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Set the default of disassemble-next-line to off


> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:42:36 +0800
> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 
> 	"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> 
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 02:16, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> "Hui" == Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > Hui> -If AUTO (which is the default), or there's no line info to determine\n\
> > Hui> +If AUTO, or there's no line info to determine\n\
> > Hui> ?the source line of the next instruction, display disassembly of next\n\
> > Hui> ?instruction instead."),
> >
> > It seems to me that this should read:
> >
> > ? ?If AUTO, and there's no line info to determine [...]
> 
> If auto:
> if this is no line info, it will output the next instruction.
> if this is line inof, it will output nothing.
> 
> If on:
> if this is no line info, it will output the next instruction.
> if this is line inof, it will display disassembly of the next source
> line whenexecution of the program being debugged stops.
> 
> If off,
> it will output nothing.
> 
> 
> I have no idea to write it clear.
> Could you please help me with it?

I already suggested a change in the doc string, see

  http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-04/msg00416.html

I didn't see any responses.  If the text I suggest there is clear, I
will fix the manual as well.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]