Re: ptid from core section

[Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>]

On Wednesday 03 June 2009 17:59:21, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:

> > It would be nice if you included the nto bits in the
> > patch, so we can see how this helps in your case, so
> > that people can check upfront if this change is
> > sufficient and good.
> > 
> oops... and you couldn't guess???  :-D

The rumours that I'm clairvoyant are really just rumours.  :-)


> ????????* sol2-tdep.h (sol2_ptid_from_core_section,
> ????????sol2_core_section_name_from_ptid): New declarations.

Please line wrap these cases like:

         * sol2-tdep.h (sol2_ptid_from_core_section)
         (sol2_core_section_name_from_ptid): New declarations.

Thanks.  Don't forget to add something like this to the changelog:

	* gdbarch.h, gdbarch.c: Regenerate.


This is mostly OK as far as I'm concerned.  One question though: 

>         (ptid_from_core_section, core_section_name_from_ptid): New 
> functions.

Is there still a reason the former takes bfd and bfd section pointers,
instead of being a mirror of the latter (say, ptid_from_core_section_name)?

-- 
Pedro Alves