Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-step" command error

[Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>]

PING

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 15:07, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> PING
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 16:13, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Marc and Michael,
>>
>> Sorry I forget this issue just reproduce in SLED 10.
>>
>> I reproduced it with cvs-head and patch can fix it. ?Michael, Please
>> help me review it.
>>
>> The attachment is the new patch follow cvs-head.
>>
>> 2009-05-06 ?Hui Zhu ?<teawater@gmail.com>
>>
>> ? ? ? * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior insert
>> ? ? ? breakpoint at right address or step in reverse and it stepped
>> ? ? ? into dynsym resolve code.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 13:31, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Marc,
>>>
>>> I cannot reproduce this issue with cvs-head.
>>> Could you please help me test with this issue?
>>> If both of us cannot reproduce this issue, ?I think I can give up this patch.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hui
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 14:10, teawater <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>>
>>>> This patch is for bug in
>>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-02/msg00246.html.
>>>>
>>>> The reason of bug is when inferior reverse exection into dynsym
>>>> resolve code, gdb doesn't insert breakpoint in right address.
>>>> It just happen in some distributions for example SLED.
>>>>
>>>> This patch make gdb insert breakpoint in right address or step in that case.
>>>>
>>>> 2008-03-02 ?Hui Zhu ?<teawater@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> ? ? ? * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Make inferior insert
>>>> ? ? ? breakpoint at right address or step in reverse and it stepped
>>>> ? ? ? into dynsym resolve code.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Hui
>>>>
>>>
>>
>