This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-step" command error
- From: "Marc Khouzam" <marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com>
- To: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder at vmware dot com>, "Hui Zhu" <teawater at gmail dot com>
- Cc: <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:51:14 -0400
- Subject: RE: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-step" command error
- References: <daef60380903012210n699d1d94kbb887def12d02e10@mail.gmail.com> <daef60380905052231n339df7dbq21debfea685444c2@mail.gmail.com> <daef60380905060113u275502dfk3c002cac312bf85f@mail.gmail.com> <daef60380905110007j4796811es152f943e86f318fe@mail.gmail.com> <daef60380906081918i34c549e8j7295e1abba24957c@mail.gmail.com> <4A3EBE3D.3090703@vmware.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Snyder [mailto:msnyder@vmware.com]
> Sent: June-21-09 7:12 PM
> To: Hui Zhu
> Cc: Marc Khouzam; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-step" command error
>
> Hui Zhu wrote:
> > PING
>
> Hui, Marc, I just posted a new patch that should replace this one.
> Please review
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-06/msg00551.html
Thanks for that.
I don't have my SLED right now, which is where I could see the
problem. I may be able to get my hands on one the week after next.
If Hui hasn't been able to test this until that time, then
I will give it a try myself.
Thanks again.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>