This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Fix too many "no debugging symbols found" warnings.
- From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: tromey at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, pedro at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:52:50 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix too many "no debugging symbols found" warnings.
- References: <20090523232414.BED2B846C2@localhost> <e394668d0906181747x2d0d4b66m272de65010f6b142@mail.gmail.com> <m31vpcp34n.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <200906222035.48910.pedro@codesourcery.com> <e394668d0906301449n24a083cfo186bd10dd5280c@mail.gmail.com> <8363ed3xkx.fsf@gnu.org> <e394668d0906302047x27957a58ibb19b60b21eb7b9c@mail.gmail.com> <83zlbo2t2p.fsf@gnu.org>
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Eli Zaretskii<eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> > This text seems to say that we will print a warning when symbols are
>> > loaded ``implicitly'', whatever that means. ?But in fact, aren't the
>> > warnings issued for files that have _no_ debugging symbols at all?
>>
>> s/implicitly loads symbols for files/tries to load symbols for a file
>> and finds the file has no symbols/
>> ?
>
> I suggest this variant:
>
> ?The @code{set print symbol-loading-warnings} command allows you to
> ?enable or disable printing of warning messages when @value{GDBN}
> ?loads an executable or a library that has no debugging symbols.
>
> WDYT?
Sounds great. Thanks.
I think we're all set then.
Does anyone have any other concerns with the patch?