Re: [mi] -stack-list-arguments --simple-values

[Niko Sams <niko dot sams at gmail dot com>]

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:05, André Pönitz<andre.poenitz@nokia.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 July 2009 19:44:53 Niko Sams wrote:
>> > It would be nice indeed. However, I have not entirely designed how a frontend
>> > should actually work with locals and arguments, so I did not do anything
>> > like that -- just fixed obvious inconsistency between existing commands.
>> >
>> Isn't every arg a local? Why would an IDE want to display arguments
>> and locals differently?
>> In KDevelop I added the arguments to the locals.
>> -stack-list-locals-and-args would be perfect.
>
> [Qt Creator does the same btw] So for me, too, yes.
>
> But in any case it would be nice to be as open as (easily) possible
> to other approaches and not to force some design decision on a
> frontend. In case of ?-stack-list-locals-and-args ?that would be
> possible by e.g. adding a ?kind="arg" / kind="local" flag or such.
>
> On a related note, can't we have the contents of a
> '-stack-list-locals-and-args' in the *stopped ?message?
If the user doesn't have a variable view shown there is no need to
update locals.
So this needs to be optional.

Niko