This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: Another proposal for frontends and queries.


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org 
> [mailto:gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Hui Zhu
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 9:46 AM
> To: Pedro Alves
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Marc Khouzam; Joel Brobecker; 
> Michael Snyder
> Subject: Re: Another proposal for frontends and queries.
> 
> >
> >
> > How is precord different?
> >
> > We very seriously need a GDB HIG.
> >
> > --
> 
> There is a patch to handle it.  I think this way is better. And I have
> said :"If you really cannot handle query with Eclipse, I think this
> patch is OK with me. "

Yes but some of the maintainers did not really like this solution.
 
> BTW, I told Marc begin a new thread to discussion why Eclipse cannot
> handle nquery.  What's happen?

This thread we're in now is this new thread you suggested.
I tried to summarize the issue and go over all the different proposals
(we are up to 4 different solutions).  My impression is that the maintainers
prefer to change PRecord (which is new) instead of changing the genereal 
GDB behaviour with respect to queries (which has been there for a long time).

Thanks

Marc


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]