This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [commit] Fix fnchange.lst


> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:01:07 -0700
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> > Here you go.  Save as "chkfnames" and invoke it like this:
> > 
> >     srcdir=FOO tmpdir=BAR ./chkfnames
> 
> Can we make the script ignore libdecnumber and gnulib, .cvsignore
> files?

There are only a few of files in libdecnumber and gnulib, so I didn't
think it was justified to remove them.  They do present a real
problem.

As for .cvsignore, they shouldn't present a problem because they are
not in the tarball.  If you are running the script on the CVS sandbox,
then I guess we need to ignore them.  I will see what I can do.

> Should we also skip testsuite files?

I don't think so.  Any conflicts cause trouble when unpacking the
tarball on 8+3 and some older Windows systems.

> Right now, the script as is generates a lot of output about some things
> that we cannot fix in GDB itself. From a Q/A perspective, this is going
> to cause us to miss.

I agree that too much noise is bad, but do we really have a lot of
noise?  How many positives are you willing to have before they are
noise?

> What should we do with the entries in section called:
> "The following resolve to the same SysV file names:"

Nothing.  We don't care about this part of doschk's output.  I thought
I made that section disappear, but it sounds like I goofed.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]