Re: [RFC] testing specifically for process record

[Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>]

Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Thursday 22 October 2009 20:38:37, Michael Snyder wrote:
> > gdb_test "record" "" "Turn on process record"
> > # FIXME: command ought to acknowledge, so we can test if it succeeded.
>
> This can now be switched to gdb_test_multiple, assuming success
> iff the command was silent, and then followed by "info record"
> reporting that recording is in effect.  Of course, all
> that done in a neat reusable function in lib/gdb.exp.  Any
> takers?  :-)

Hmm, that's good... unfortunately "record" will succeed even
for a remote target, so it doesn't help me with the larger
problem of detecting remote vs. native.  We want to avoid using
the process-record commands if we're remote (eg. Simics).