This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [MI tracepoints 5/9] -break-passcount

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:37:13 -0600
Subject: Re: [MI tracepoints 5/9] -break-passcount
References: <201003141156.07046.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <m3zl29cn51.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <201003161513.30609.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Volodya" == Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com> writes:

Tom> Doesn't the use of get_tracepoint make it tracepoint-specific?
Tom> Or is this changed somewhere in the patch series?

Volodya> I was confused. This command remains specific to tracepoint, there's
Volodya> no patch (yet?) that merges -break-passcount and -break-after and
Volodya> in fact, it's probably not a good idea.

In that case, shouldn't the new command be called -trace-passcount, not
-break-passcount?

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MI tracepoints 5/9] -break-passcount
  - From: Vladimir Prus

References:
- [MI tracepoints 5/9] -break-passcount
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: [MI tracepoints 5/9] -break-passcount
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [MI tracepoints 5/9] -break-passcount
  - From: Vladimir Prus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]