This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes?

From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>, Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:47:36 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes?
References: <20100318173015.6765784413@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <20100318192535.GA25322@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <e394668d1003181238p1ccf89b0s682db8cbe1c7fd10@mail.gmail.com>

Did you try grepping for other uses of ui_out_field_core_addr?
Would other places need adjustment as well?
And what about posting the before-with-no-patch-what-soever
vs after-patch-that-aligns-right examples of "info break",
instead of just leftalign-after-patch vs leftalign-after-patch?

-- 
Pedro Alves

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes?
  - From: Doug Evans

References:
- [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes?
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes?
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [RFC] Why does ui_out_field_core_addr pad with leading zeroes?
  - From: Doug Evans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]