This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] target record_core -> target record-core?
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Doug Evans <dje at sebabeach dot org>
- Cc: msnyder at vmware dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:06:06 -0600
- Subject: Re: [RFA] target record_core -> target record-core?
- References: <20100419064717.75D476E3DC@sebabeach.org>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@sebabeach.org> writes:
Doug> I realize this is a nit but is it possible to rename
Doug> target record_core to target record-core?
Doug> Or is it too late ...
Thanks for catching this.
Doug> All other targets (that I know of) use dashes in shortname, and having
Doug> to remember which use dashes and which use underscores is, umm, blechy.
Additionally, I prefer dashes because they are simpler to type.
I think we can retroactively fix mistakes here by adding deprecated
aliases.
One more thing I've wanted is also making it so deprecated commands
don't show up in completion when there is a non-deprecated completion
available. Any comments on that?
Tom