This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] gdb.trace/*.exp send_gdb vs. gdb_test

From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Stan Shebs <stan at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 12:08:40 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb.trace/*.exp send_gdb vs. gdb_test
References: <4BFEB77D.4080107@vmware.com> <201005271922.03831.pedro@codesourcery.com>

Pedro Alves wrote:

On Thursday 27 May 2010 19:18:37, Michael Snyder wrote:
This patch should get extra-thorough review and preferably be tested by
the tracepoint maintainers, since I wasn't able to test all of it.
Did you test it against gdbserver x86 or x86_64? That should cover it:

<http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/TestingGDB#Testing_gdbserver_in_a_native_configuration>


OK thanks.  They all work except for limits.exp, which does not run
because it tests "tstatus" before it executes "target remote".

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] gdb.trace/*.exp send_gdb vs. gdb_test
  - From: Pedro Alves

References:
- [RFA] gdb.trace/*.exp send_gdb vs. gdb_test
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: [RFA] gdb.trace/*.exp send_gdb vs. gdb_test
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]