This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: support biarch gcore?
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com, Jon dot Zhou at jdsu dot com, gdb at sourceware dot org, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 21:47:04 -0700
- Subject: Re: support biarch gcore?
- References: <201007062128.o66LSkNC032580@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <201007071230.o67CUZYU029252@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 22:48:44 +0200 (CEST)
>> > From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, it also turned out that the section sizes provided for
>> > .reg in those targets that have gdbarch_core_regset_sections, while
>> > currently unused, were also nearly all wrong ...
>> >
>> > The following patch fixes those sizes, and changes linux-nat.c to
>> > use them.
>
>> Although I don't feel qualified to judge the powerpc bits, this makes
>> quite a bit of sense to me. ?And yes, the value for amd64-linux is
>> obviously wrong.
>
> OK, thanks!
>
> I've checked the patch in now.
>
Does this fix
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11467
You can verify it with the testcase in
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-04/msg00425.html
--
H.J.