This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] fix build failure for win64, revise some format strings


On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Ozkan" == Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Ozkan> gdb/gdbserver/
> Ozkan> ?* server.c (handle_query): For windows, Use %I64d instead of
> Ozkan> ?%lld in the sprintf format string.
>
> I don't know much about gdbserver. ?So I am going to ask that someone
> else look at this part.
>
> Ozkan> (Note: debug_to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint() specifically
> Ozkan> did not use 0x%lx but only %ld for the addr value. ?Should I
> Ozkan> not care, or should I change my patch to use
> Ozkan> host_address_to_string ((void *) addr) + 2
> Ozkan> ... to skip the "0x" instead?
>
> Don't worry about it, using host_address_to_string is fine.
>
> Ozkan> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?host_address_to_string ((void *) bp_tgt->placed_address),
>
> I think you should not need these casts to void*.

Actually I do: placed_address is CORE_ADDR which is
bfd_vma, ie. uintptr_t and not a pointer.

>
> The gdb parts of this patch are ok with that change. ?Thanks.
>

Still OK without removing the casts?

> Tom
>

--
Ozkan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]