This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: support biarch gcore?

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>, Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com, Jon dot Zhou at jdsu dot com, gdb at sourceware dot org, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:45:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: support biarch gcore?
References: <AANLkTilVek7wMZ4FciwRmzoXJbHsRDnhOphzHJPvU3Is@mail.gmail.com> <201007081115.o68BFm50023408@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <AANLkTimQRQeRUPtRFiXuU7Z2RWfYItt07gOcZBeAYj9R@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, H.J. Lu wrote:

> Very good point. There are some arch specific tests which are either
> 32bit or 64bit. Currently, we check target. It doesn't work -m32. We
> need something like
> 
> /* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */
> /* { dg-require-effective-target ilp32 } */

I noted the issue with GDB testcases hardcoding target name tests in a 
previous discussion 
<http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-03/msg00711.html>, and I think 
adopting GCC-style effective target support would be a good solution.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- Re: support biarch gcore?
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: support biarch gcore?
  - From: Ulrich Weigand
- Re: support biarch gcore?
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]