This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Delayed physnames, revisited

From: Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>
To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:16:46 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFA] Delayed physnames, revisited
References: <4C460EAC.3040600@redhat.com> <m3iq362y55.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <AANLkTinRszypTZJ2WZ2rAH15ZqUh5CjP5cirr=kGQrAD@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/19/2010 04:25 PM, Doug Evans wrote:

Folks are great at enforcing things like putting a space after the
function name in a function call, but not so good at enforcing having
a blank line between a function's comment and definition.

Keith, can you fix that?

Committed with that trivial change.

Thanks Tom and Doug!

Keith

Follow-Ups:
- New UNRESOLVED testcase gdb.dwarf2/dw2-double-set-die-type.exp [Re: [RFA] Delayed physnames, revisited]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

References:
- Re: [RFA] Delayed physnames, revisited
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [RFA] Delayed physnames, revisited
  - From: Doug Evans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]