This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] solib-display.exp: displays for local variables automatically disabled

From: Xingxing Pan <forandom at gmail dot com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:29:28 +0800
Subject: Re: [patch] solib-display.exp: displays for local variables automatically disabled
References: <AANLkTimJzsXFrQ+9yErKP-V63=Bn=mrQfQHNhTFdf_fq@mail.gmail.com> <20101108143618.GA30630@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <AANLkTin3WfSRcmZnc2jke_Pebhp0dMM5V==0CJDBR87o@mail.gmail.com> <20101109024617.GA20814@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>

Hi, Jan.

I found the reason. The arch-dependented function gdbarch_init should
reuse the existing arch.
I've to say sorry that something happend during the porting, and this
problem is not common.

Thanks,
Pan Xingxing

2010/11/9 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>:
> Hi Pan,
>
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 03:36:21 +0100, Xingxing Pan wrote:
>> Is it normal to have d->exp->gdbarch != get_current_arch() after restart?
>
> No, that is not normal.
>
> It may be something with the Thumb vs. non-Thumb arch? ?I do not know much
> ARM.
>
> But at least now I can image how it can happen, I will re-check it.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jan
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] solib-display.exp: displays for local variables automatically disabled
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

References:
- [patch] solib-display.exp: displays for local variables automatically disabled
  - From: Xingxing Pan
- Re: [patch] solib-display.exp: displays for local variables automatically disabled
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]