This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFC: next/finish/etc -vs- exceptions
>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
Tom> Here is what I am testing.
Jan> OK. Included a ChangeLog entry.
Thanks.
I had to modify the test a little to make it pass with gcc svn trunk.
It seems the test was a bit confused about the line number it was on.
Here is what I am checking in.
Tom
2010-12-15 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* infrun.c (save_infcall_control_state): Handle the
exception-resume breakpoint.
(restore_infcall_control_state): Likewise.
(discard_infcall_control_state): Likewise.
2010-12-15 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* gdb.cp/nextoverthrow.cc (dummy): Return int 0.
(NextOverThrowDerivates) <resumebpt>: New.
(resumebpt_test): New.
(main): Call resumebpt_test.
* gdb.cp/nextoverthrow.exp: New block for test of "resumebpt".
Index: infrun.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/infrun.c,v
retrieving revision 1.461
diff -u -r1.461 infrun.c
--- infrun.c 9 Dec 2010 16:09:52 -0000 1.461
+++ infrun.c 15 Dec 2010 21:15:45 -0000
@@ -6379,6 +6379,7 @@
inf_status->inferior_control = inf->control;
tp->control.step_resume_breakpoint = NULL;
+ tp->control.exception_resume_breakpoint = NULL;
/* Save original bpstat chain to INF_STATUS; replace it in TP with copy of
chain. If caller's caller is walking the chain, they'll be happier if we
@@ -6428,6 +6429,10 @@
if (tp->control.step_resume_breakpoint)
tp->control.step_resume_breakpoint->disposition = disp_del_at_next_stop;
+ if (tp->control.exception_resume_breakpoint)
+ tp->control.exception_resume_breakpoint->disposition
+ = disp_del_at_next_stop;
+
/* Handle the bpstat_copy of the chain. */
bpstat_clear (&tp->control.stop_bpstat);
@@ -6476,6 +6481,10 @@
inf_status->thread_control.step_resume_breakpoint->disposition
= disp_del_at_next_stop;
+ if (inf_status->thread_control.exception_resume_breakpoint)
+ inf_status->thread_control.exception_resume_breakpoint->disposition
+ = disp_del_at_next_stop;
+
/* See save_infcall_control_state for info on stop_bpstat. */
bpstat_clear (&inf_status->thread_control.stop_bpstat);
Index: testsuite/gdb.cp/nextoverthrow.cc
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/nextoverthrow.cc,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 nextoverthrow.cc
--- testsuite/gdb.cp/nextoverthrow.cc 9 Dec 2010 16:09:53 -0000 1.1
+++ testsuite/gdb.cp/nextoverthrow.cc 15 Dec 2010 21:15:47 -0000
@@ -19,8 +19,9 @@
using namespace std;
-void dummy ()
+int dummy ()
{
+ return 0;
}
class NextOverThrowDerivates
@@ -89,10 +90,39 @@
function1 (val); // until here
}
+ void resumebpt (int val)
+ {
+ try
+ {
+ throw val;
+ }
+ catch (int x)
+ {
+ dummy ();
+ }
+ }
+
};
NextOverThrowDerivates next_cases;
+int
+resumebpt_test (int x)
+{
+ try
+ {
+ next_cases.resumebpt (x); // Start: resumebpt
+ next_cases.resumebpt (x + 1); // Second: resumebpt
+ }
+ catch (int val)
+ {
+ dummy ();
+ x = val;
+ }
+
+ return x;
+}
+
int main ()
{
int testval = -1;
@@ -198,6 +228,8 @@
testval = val; // End: advance
}
+ // Test of "resumebpt".
+ testval = resumebpt_test (10);
+
testval = 32; // done
}
-
Index: testsuite/gdb.cp/nextoverthrow.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/nextoverthrow.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 nextoverthrow.exp
--- testsuite/gdb.cp/nextoverthrow.exp 9 Dec 2010 16:09:53 -0000 1.1
+++ testsuite/gdb.cp/nextoverthrow.exp 15 Dec 2010 21:15:47 -0000
@@ -149,5 +149,14 @@
tbreak_and_cont "End: advance"
verify_testval "pre-check - advance" 8
+tbreak_and_cont "Start: resumebpt"
+gdb_test "tbreak _Unwind_RaiseException"
+gdb_test "continue" "Temporary breakpoint.*" "continuing to _Unwind_RaiseException"
+gdb_test "finish" "Run till exit .*"
+gdb_test {set $retpc=$pc}
+gdb_test {break *$retpc if dummy ()}
+tbreak_and_cont "Second: resumebpt"
+gdb_test "next"
+
tbreak_and_cont "done"
-verify_testval "post-check - advance" 9
+verify_testval "post-check - advance" 10