This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: segfault: what should happen when I remove an inferior that is running?

From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Cc: Marc Khouzam <marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com>, "'Tom Tromey'" <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:16:51 +0000
Subject: Re: segfault: what should happen when I remove an inferior that is running?
References: <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC572E0C0E1A@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> <201012221210.30198.pedro@codesourcery.com> <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC5730924C20@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>

On Wednesday 22 December 2010 18:11:45, Marc Khouzam wrote:
> > > If it is ok, please let me know if you want it only in HEAD or
> > > also in 7_2.
> > 
> > "running inferior" will sound a bit odd for cores, but,
> > since I don't have a better suggestion that wouldn't involve
> > more coding, this is okay with me (HEAD and 7_2).
> 
> Would "Can not remove a an active inferior." be better?

Fine with me.

-- 
Pedro Alves

Follow-Ups:
- RE: segfault: what should happen when I remove an inferior that is running?
  - From: Marc Khouzam

References:
- Re: segfault: what should happen when I remove an inferior that is running?
  - From: Pedro Alves
- RE: segfault: what should happen when I remove an inferior that is running?
  - From: Marc Khouzam

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]