This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] gdb: add callback defines for new ARGV handling
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> The common sim code has slightly unfinished support for these already,
>> but even arch ports are unable to handle these if the common header does
>> not define them. ?This is because the generated callback header includes
>> simple common gdb/sim headers only which causes it to skip the new ARGV
>> syscalls. ?Plus, it isn't like providing these in the common header will
>> break any sim targets which don't want them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
>>
>> 2010-01-06 ?Mike Frysinger ?<vapier@gentoo.org>
>>
>> ? ? ? ?* callback.h (CB_SYS_argc, CB_SYS_argnlen, CB_SYS_argn): Define.
>> ---
>> ?include/gdb/callback.h | ? ?5 +++++
>> ?1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/gdb/callback.h b/include/gdb/callback.h
>> index a1f79f9..296dfc3 100644
>> --- a/include/gdb/callback.h
>> +++ b/include/gdb/callback.h
>> @@ -231,6 +231,11 @@ extern host_callback default_callback;
>> ?#define CB_SYS_truncate ? ? ? ?21
>> ?#define CB_SYS_ftruncate 22
>> ?#define CB_SYS_pipe ? ?23
>> +
>> +/* New ARGV support. ?*/
>> +#define CB_SYS_argc ? ?24
>> +#define CB_SYS_argnlen 25
>> +#define CB_SYS_argn ? ?26
>>
>> ?/* Struct use to pass and return information necessary to perform a
>> ? ?system call. ?*/
>
> The common sim code has CB_SYS_{argv,argvlen}, but I don't see the above.
> Where do they come from?
pretty much all the callback "syscalls" that the sim handles are
because of newlib/libgloss
-mike