This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Fix display of array of unspecified length inside structures


On Friday 18 February 2011 14:54:03, Pierre Muller wrote:

> > On Friday 18 February 2011 11:08:38, Pierre Muller wrote:
> > 
> > > PS: It could be wise to add some test in the testsuite for
> > > this, but I have no idea where I could insert this kind of test,
> > > any ideas?
> > 
> > Yes, please.  We have surprisingly few tests for this sort of
> > thing, AFAICS.  I'm not even sure this is a regression from
> > my recent changes, I think it may well not be.
> 
>   I checked out gdb version 7.2 shows this regression,
> as compared to Cygwin 6.8 at least...
> Which means that the regression is not really recent.
> 
>   This might means that we should also merge this patch to
> the branch, no?

Sound fine to me.

>  
> > Zero-length arrays (as poor man's flexible arrays) are supported
> > in GNU C as an extension.  To be portable, you'd
> > need to use an array of length 1 (or c99's real flexible arrays),
> > but that won't trigger the bug.
>   Apparently there is also the flexible array member construct
> see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.2/gcc/Zero-Length.html

That just confirms what I said.  :-)  The flexible array
member construst is C99 only, so it's likely that other
compilers choke on it by default.

> > I'd point at printcmds.exp, but I'm not sure if there are compilers
> > out there that choke on the construct...  There's always a
> > new test file option...
> > 
> > > PS2: It is probably impossible to make such a test without
> > > alloca or some other memory allocation function, no?
> > > Are there any system restriction for this?
> 
>   There is a long check at start of gdb.base/funcargs.c
> but it might just be to really check that alloca really uses
> the stack...

Irk.  Just use malloc then?  It's not really crutial that
the test runs on all targets/hosts.  As long as it runs
on the targets must people are developing on (GNU/Linux,Windows),
it's fine, we're reasonably well covered.

-- 
Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]