This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] info break/watch/trace use get_number_or_range, take two
> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:31:47 -0800
> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
> CC: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>,
> "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> >> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:16:51 +0000
> >> Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
> >>
> >>> add_info ("breakpoints", breakpoints_info, _("\
> >>> -Status of user-settable breakpoints, or breakpoint number NUMBER.\n\
> >>> +Status of user-settable breakpoints listed, or all breakpoints if no argument.\n\
> >> "listed" doesn't sound obviously referring to the spec
> >> you pass as argument to the command. "listed where? the
> >> command itself is printing a list." was my thought. Is
> >> there any other way to spell that?
> >
> > How about just losing the "listed" part? What important information
> > does it convey in this context?
>
> What wording do you suggest?
How about
Status of specified breakpoints (all user-settable breakpoints if no argument).
?