This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Regression: graceful unwind termination when we'd need unavailable/uncollect memory or registers to unwind further
- From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- To: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:21:59 +0100
- Subject: Re: Regression: graceful unwind termination when we'd need unavailable/uncollect memory or registers to unwind further
- References: <201102221834.42413.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110320184845.GA30084@host1.jankratochvil.net> <201103221113.17253.pedro@codesourcery.com>
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:13:16 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Yep, and you can. The quirk is x/i / disassemble specific. The
> error is thrown while trying to decide whether to print the "==>" that
> indicates the current PC.
Aha.
> Below's the patch. Doesn't cause regressions for me.
I can confirm it works here as proclaimed. Please check it in.
> Did you see any other regression?
No.
Thanks,
Jan