This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfc, arm] Always use correct execution state for single-step breakpoints
- From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- To: brobecker at adacore dot com (Joel Brobecker)
- Cc: yao at codesourcery dot com (Yao Qi), gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:10:44 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [rfc, arm] Always use correct execution state for single-step breakpoints
Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > > > +if ![runto_main] then {
> > > > + gdb_suppress_tests
> > > > +}
>
> We decided a long time ago that gdb_suppress_entire_file,
> gdb_suppress_tests et al should no longer be used...
OK, fine with me.
> > I don't really have a strong opinion on that, except that perror is
> > probably wrong (this is supposed to be uses to signal problems in
> > the test *framework* itself). I'd say that if there is a reasonable
> > expectation that starting up the test may fail on some platforms,
> > a failure of runto_main ought to trigger something like UNTESTED
> > or UNSUPPORTED. Otherwise it should trigger a FAIL.
>
> What we document right now is:
>
> if ![runto_main] {
> return -1
> }
>
> (http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDBTestcaseCookbook)
Ah, I wasn't even aware we had this :-/ Nice!
> We might have discussed it, but I'm not sure. I see your point
> about posting an UNTESTED OR UNSUPPORTED, which I think
> prepare_for_testing does. In fact, an old message (from
> most likely DanielJ, in 2006):
>
> > I've been using untested followed by return. Why wouldn't that be
> > ideal?
>
> So, if that's agreeable to everyone, I will change the Cookbook
> to follow that.
UNTESTED looks good to me.
Appended below is the current version of the test case I'm using.
Any additional thoughts?
Bye,
Ulrich
--- /dev/null 2011-03-29 13:48:30.897232565 +0200
+++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/thumb-singlestep.exp 2011-03-29 14:54:18.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+# Copyright 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+# Test single-stepping into incorrectly marked Thumb routine
+
+if {![istarget arm*-*]} then {
+ verbose "Skipping ARM tests."
+ return
+}
+
+set testfile "thumb-singlestep"
+set srcfile ${testfile}.S
+
+set additional_flags "additional_flags=-mthumb"
+if [prepare_for_testing ${testfile}.exp ${testfile} ${srcfile} [list debug $additional_flags]] {
+ untested ${testfile}.exp
+ return -1
+}
+
+if ![runto_main] then {
+ untested ${testfile}.exp
+ return -1
+}
+
+gdb_test "si" "foo \\(\\) at .*${srcfile}.*mov r0,#42.*" "step into foo"
+
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com