This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
On 04/16/2011 04:29 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 03:46:09PM +0200, Baars, M.J. wrote:
When you look at the code in question more closely, you will see that it
will present the content of the status word in more detail than the
On 04/16/2011 10:24 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Oops... did I remove one of your entries in the ChangeLog? :)
No! This is a .tar.gz. Proper diffs don't come as a .tar.gz.
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:08:48 +0200
From: "Baars, M.J."<firstname.lastname@example.org>
I believe this is the format you requested?
If you want a patch to be committed, eventually you're going to have
to say why. What's the goal of the patch?
Also, why on earth are you messing about with old changelog entries?The old function can thus be seen as obsolete, and should be removed
from the old log entries.