This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [RFA-v2] Handle cygwin wchar_t specifics


  Hi Eli,

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De?: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Eli Zaretskii
> Envoyé?: dimanche 17 avril 2011 04:56
> À?: Pierre Muller
> Cc?: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com; tromey@redhat.com; gdb-
> patches@sourceware.org
> Objet?: Re: [RFA-v2] Handle cygwin wchar_t specifics
> 
> > From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
> > Cc: "'Tom Tromey'" <tromey@redhat.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> > Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 23:28:35 +0200
> >
> > -/* If __STDC_ISO_10646__ is defined, then the host wchar_t is UCS-4.
> > +/* If __STDC_ISO_10646__ is defined, then the host wchar_t is UCS-4 or
> UCS-2.
> 
> Please use UTF-16, not UCS-2.  What Windows uses is the former.  The
> latter is the old name from the days when Unicode covered only the
> BMP; it was superseded by UTF-16 that covers more than that.

  Are you sure this is correct?
I tried what you said, but "UTF-16" seems to mean "UTF-16BE"
while UTF-16LE" seems to do a better job.


  But if UTF-16 is better than UCS-2,
shouldn't we also favor UTF-32 over UCS-4?
 
  I will send a new RFA using UTF16-LE for windows shortly.

Pierre


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]