This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch 2/2] Disable epilogue unwinders on recent GCCs [Re: Regression: Re: [PATCH] Fix some i386 unwinder inconcistencies]

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:56:28 -0600
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Disable epilogue unwinders on recent GCCs [Re: Regression: Re: [PATCH] Fix some i386 unwinder inconcistencies]
References: <201106122057.p5CKvUEa030437@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20110613104911.GA1965@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110626084140.GB28242@host1.jankratochvil.net>

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Jan> I find questionable this detection uses DWARF DW_AT_producer.

Me too, but unless GCC emits some other new bit, I don't see how else we
could reasonably get this information.

Tom

References:
- [PATCH] Fix some i386 unwinder inconcistencies
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Regression: Re: [PATCH] Fix some i386 unwinder inconcistencies
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- [patch 2/2] Disable epilogue unwinders on recent GCCs [Re: Regression: Re: [PATCH] Fix some i386 unwinder inconcistencies]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]