This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Fix implicit pointer vs. typedefs

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:25:53 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix implicit pointer vs. typedefs
References: <20110718150124.GA24706@host1.jankratochvil.net> <m3vcuz7gea.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:33:17 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Thanks Jan.  It looks good to me.

Checked in:
	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2011-07/msg00165.html


> I have come around to your view that we should get rid of check_typedef.

For that (VLA) plan I think it would be useful to base it already on C++.


Thanks,
Jan

References:
- [patch] Fix implicit pointer vs. typedefs
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] Fix implicit pointer vs. typedefs
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]