This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch 2/2] Fix decode_locdesc for gcc-4.7.x optimized DWARF

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:01:52 -0600
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Fix decode_locdesc for gcc-4.7.x optimized DWARF
References: <20110727153041.GB9736@host1.jankratochvil.net> <m3bowfae2m.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20110727165744.GA27603@host1.jankratochvil.net>

Tom> I don't understand why DWARF_VALUE_REGISTER is ok here,

Jan> Made there a new comment - Drow says it is needed.

Tom> or why DWARF_VALUE_LITERAL is not.

Jan> That is for DW_OP_implicit_value (DW_OP_lit* does not use
Jan> DWARF_VALUE_LITERAL).  It hasn't been supported so far and I do not
Jan> think the callers of decode_locdesc need DW_OP_implicit_value.  I
Jan> find it outside of the scope of this patch, it is definitely not a
Jan> regression.

Thanks.
It is fine by me.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 2/2] Fix decode_locdesc for gcc-4.7.x optimized DWARF
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

References:
- [patch 2/2] Fix decode_locdesc for gcc-4.7.x optimized DWARF
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch 2/2] Fix decode_locdesc for gcc-4.7.x optimized DWARF
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [patch 2/2] Fix decode_locdesc for gcc-4.7.x optimized DWARF
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]