This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] 12843


>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> writes:

Tom> My first reaction is against this, but I don't have a particularly good
Tom> explanation for that.  I will think about it.

Keith> Is there actually any reason to require a flag? Couldn't we simply
Keith> allow either a flag-based location _or_ a linespec, but not both,

I think there are 2 ideas here.

For MI we can just add options, as you say.  This causes no problems for
compatibility; it may be a bit of a pain to implement, but nothing
crazily difficult, just some more virtual methods in breakpoint.

I thought Andre's proposal about "set breakpoint syntax 2011" was
specifically for the CLI, where it would switch from linespec to
something new.  That's what I was responding to.

Keith> I wouldn't be surprised if IDEs adopted the flag-based version
Keith> very quickly.

Yeah.  I filed a bug for this:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13139

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]