This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] 12843

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: AndrÃ PÃnitz <andre dot poenitz at nokia dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:20:58 -0600
Subject: Re: [RFA] 12843
References: <4E56C5A0.60802@redhat.com> <201108301021.15313.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> <m3pqjnc586.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <201108301833.47083.andre.poenitz@nokia.com>

>>>>> "AndrÃ" == AndrÃ PÃnitz <andre.poenitz@nokia.com> writes:

Tom> Do you generate MI-compliant output from Python?  I'm curious.

AndrÃ> Sort of. Originally it was fully compliant, then extra fields had been
AndrÃ> added and additional commas became "legal" (to save a few cycles
AndrÃ> for the check whether they are necessary). But it's still pretty MI-ish.

I ask because I occasionally wonder whether it would be useful to add
support for converting (a subset of) Python objects to MI.

Phil might need it for breakpoint_ops; but I think we were thinking in
terms of a one-off, where a generic facility might be better.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] 12843
  - From: AndrÃ PÃnitz

References:
- [RFA] 12843
  - From: Keith Seitz
- Re: [RFA] 12843
  - From: AndrÃ PÃnitz
- Re: [RFA] 12843
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [RFA] 12843
  - From: AndrÃ PÃnitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]