Re: [RFA] Preliminary work in fork_inferior

[Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>]

Thanks, this is okay.

On Friday 16 September 2011 13:28:59, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> +      /* If we get here, it's an error.  */
>        if (shell)
>         {
> -         execlp (shell_file, shell_file, "-c", shell_command, (char *) 0);
> -
> -         /* If we get here, it's an error.  */
>           fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stderr, "Cannot exec %s: %s.\n", shell_file,
>                               safe_strerror (errno));

I wouldn't mind merging the "Cannot exec" bits of both branches as well,
always printing the whole argv.

> -         gdb_flush (gdb_stderr);
> -         _exit (0177);
>         }
>        else
>         {
> -         /* Otherwise, we directly exec the target program with
> -            execvp.  */
>           int i;
>  
> -         execvp (exec_file, argv);
> -
> -         /* If we get here, it's an error.  */


>           safe_strerror (errno);

This obviously isn't doing what was intended though...

>           fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stderr, "Cannot exec %s ", exec_file);

-- 
Pedro Alves