This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Status of 'blacklist' patch?


On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:07, Justin Lebar <justin.lebar@gmail.com> wrote:
> I last pinged gdb-patches about the patch on May 16 and got no response.
>
> I imagine the patch has bitrotted by now. ÂI'd be happy to bring it up
> to date if there were a reasonable chance it would get reviewed this
> time.

Thanks.  I would very much like to see it in GDB but I have no real
way of making it happen other than to generate user demand for it.
Over on GCC, we are discussing converting some macros into one-liner
inline functions and we want to avoid the mess this would cause for
'step' in the presence of things like foo(f(g()), h()).

One additional request that came up in the thread I pointed you to
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg00324.html) is Jakub's
request to blacklist DW_AT_artificial functions by default.  I think
that's a good idea.


Thanks.  Diego.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]