Re: [patch, gdbserver] Uninsert bpkt when regular and fast tracepoint are set at the same address

[Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>]

On 10/29/2011 08:15 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
> Another thing I want you to help me to understand is what is wrong with
> my patch?  In my patch, the interpretation of shadow is different from
> yours.  In my patch, when raw breakpoint and fast tracepoint jump is set
> at the same address, shadow of breakpoint is a copy of jump insn.  It
> makes easier in uninsert breakpoint, because check_mem_write is not
> needed, and we can simply write memory.  The only problem I can think of
> is about removing fast tracepoint first, and leaving breakpoint still
> there.  Except this problem, is there any more problem?

I find my patch caused some regression on my local tracepoint test
cases, and I figured out why my patch is wrong.  Please ignore this
question.

-- 
Yao (éå)