This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Notes on -Wshadow patches

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
To: Andrey Smirnov <andrew dot smirnov at gmail dot com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, tromey at redhat dot com, mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 13:52:21 -0800
Subject: Re: Notes on -Wshadow patches
References: <877h2l7nth.fsf@gmail.com> <E1RUeSM-0003Dc-Jd@fencepost.gnu.org> <CAHQ1cqES8S0KkANxC3X+9G-f2E82NcE-KRmZkYk=KX5dj=Eg5Q@mail.gmail.com>

> Not that that I'm an exprt on git, but, no, I am unaware of such
> functionality. But it doesn't matter, since, as I said, commit
> messages already contain what is to be later added to the changelog, i
> just didn't add that to the actual ChangeLog file and therefore it is
> not in the diff.

You don't need to worry about this - ChangeLog entries do not need
to be included in the patch. All they do is create conflicts when
someone tries to apply your patch to his tree.

-- 
Joel

References:
- Notes on -Wshadow patches
  - From: Andrey Smirnov
- Re: Notes on -Wshadow patches
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: Notes on -Wshadow patches
  - From: Andrey Smirnov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]