This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC/WIP PATCH 11/14] Add I/T set support to most execution commands

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:27:15 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFC/WIP PATCH 11/14] Add I/T set support to most execution commands
References: <20111128153742.17761.21459.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <20111128153953.17761.62637.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:

Pedro> This adds I/T set support to most execution commands.

Very nice.

Pedro> Lastly, all these switches are currently implemented in the
Pedro> following commands:

Pedro> step, next, stepi, nexti, continue, until, jump, signal, finish
Pedro> and interrupt.

I thought there was a PR open about "continue -a" not working when there
are multiple inferiors, but I couldn't find it just now.  Anyway I guess
this series would fix it.

Pedro>  - make sure that we're not regressing against a target that doesn't
Pedro>    support non-stop/async.  I haven't tried that yet.

A user on irc specifically asked about making sure that this doesn't
regress Windows.

Tom

References:
- [RFC/WIP PATCH 00/14] I/T sets
  - From: Pedro Alves
- [RFC/WIP PATCH 11/14] Add I/T set support to most execution commands
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]