This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfc] Options for "info mappings" etc. (Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command)


On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:15:46 +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> protocol, for one simple reason:  I cannot open /proc/PID/... because
> I do not even know the PID to use.  With the remote target, the "PID"
> used within GDB may have no relationship whatsoever to the actual PID
> on a Linux remote target; in fact, it usually is the "magic" 42000 ...
> 
> While in some cases, the (a) remote PID may be encoded into the GDB
> TID field, I cannot use this in -tdep code either, because when used
> with the native target, the TID is never a PID/LWP.
> 
> Any suggestions?

It nicely proves the filenames should be abstracted by the target gdbserver.


Regards,
Jan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]