This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC stub-side break conditions 1/5] Documentation bits
> >To align with subject, I doubt it should be "stub-side" rather than
> >"target-side".
> >
>
> I would prefer to say "target-side" everywhere actually - no one
> really knows what we mean by "stub", and if they try to understand
> it by looking at, say, our foo-stub.c files, they'll get really
> confused. :-) "Target-side" has the right connotation of "outside
> GDB" but without committing to a specific implementation strategy -
> like conditional breakpoint tests in h/w debug registers, which
> would be the most awesome...
Indeed. Just to be sure: we should also change the name of the setting
from "stub" to "target".
--
Joel