This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Decouple "set confirm" from `from_tty'.
On 01/23/2012 04:25 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:13:51 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> Comments?
>
> Just that I would prefer renaming to be a separate commit, otherwise it
> somehow complicates later regressions analysis etc. Sure very minor note.
>
> The real change here is negligible in size compared to the renaming.
Sure. I've now committed the patch below, which is the same, but
without the renaming.
gdb/
2012-01-23 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* top.c (caution): Update comment.
(execute_command): Don't consider the current value of `caution'.
gdb/testsuite/
2012-01-23 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* gdb.base/call-signal-resume.exp: Allow output after "return".
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/call-signal-resume.exp | 4 ++--
gdb/top.c | 12 +++++++-----
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/call-signal-resume.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/call-signal-resume.exp
index 1c4517d..d383f5c 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/call-signal-resume.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/call-signal-resume.exp
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ if { "$frame_number" == "" } {
# Pop the dummy frame.
gdb_test "frame $frame_number" ".*"
gdb_test_no_output "set confirm off"
-gdb_test_no_output "return"
+gdb_test "return" ""
# Resume execution, the program should continue without any signal.
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ if { "$frame_number" == "" } {
# Pop the dummy frame.
gdb_test "frame $frame_number" ".*"
gdb_test_no_output "set confirm off"
-gdb_test_no_output "return"
+gdb_test "return" ""
# Continue again, this time we should get to the signal handler.
diff --git a/gdb/top.c b/gdb/top.c
index c4e913d..346d73b 100644
--- a/gdb/top.c
+++ b/gdb/top.c
@@ -98,9 +98,11 @@ int use_windows = 0;
extern char lang_frame_mismatch_warn[]; /* language.c */
-/* Flag for whether we want all the "from_tty" gubbish printed. */
+/* Flag for whether we want to confirm potentially dangerous
+ operations. Default is yes. */
+
+int caution = 1;
-int caution = 1; /* Default is yes, sigh. */
static void
show_caution (struct ui_file *file, int from_tty,
struct cmd_list_element *c, const char *value)
@@ -471,13 +473,13 @@ execute_command (char *p, int from_tty)
if (c->class == class_user)
execute_user_command (c, arg);
else if (c->type == set_cmd || c->type == show_cmd)
- do_setshow_command (arg, from_tty & caution, c);
+ do_setshow_command (arg, from_tty, c);
else if (!cmd_func_p (c))
error (_("That is not a command, just a help topic."));
else if (deprecated_call_command_hook)
- deprecated_call_command_hook (c, arg, from_tty & caution);
+ deprecated_call_command_hook (c, arg, from_tty);
else
- cmd_func (c, arg, from_tty & caution);
+ cmd_func (c, arg, from_tty);
/* If the interpreter is in sync mode (we're running a user
command's list, running command hooks or similars), and we