This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] gdbserver: Handle DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP dynamic tag


Hi Pedro,

> Yeah, I had noticed that on
> <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00142.html>, but never got
> to propose a fix.  Sorry about that.

 Well, I'm supposed to catch this kind of breakage myself these days. ;)

> > Index: gdb-fsf-trunk-quilt/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- gdb-fsf-trunk-quilt.orig/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c	2012-04-03 13:38:58.575561428 +0100
> > +++ gdb-fsf-trunk-quilt/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c	2012-04-03 13:39:17.315624148 +0100
> > @@ -5419,7 +5419,9 @@ get_dynamic (const int pid, const int is
> >  }
> >  
> >  /* Return &_r_debug in the inferior, or -1 if not present.  Return value
> > -   can be 0 if the inferior does not yet have the library list initialized.  */
> > +   can be 0 if the inferior does not yet have the library list initialized.
> > +   We look for DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP first.  MIPS executables use this instead of
> > +   DT_DEBUG, although they sometimes contain an unused DT_DEBUG entry too.  */
> 
> Can that "unused DT_DEBUG" entry ever appear before DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP in the tags
> list?  With this patch, we'll stop looking if we see DT_DEBUG first, while
> solib-svr4.c in GDB first looks for DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP in all tags, and only
> if not found looks for DT_DEBUG (presumably, if there's no DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP,
> then there's no DT_DEBUG either; only if DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP exist might there be
> a DT_DEBUG).  Do we need to worry about this?

 Hmm, I've double-checked the sources and as you say solib-svr4.c does not 
rely on the order of the tags indeed.  I got mislead by the comment in 
MIPS BFD that says:

      /* SGI object has the equivalence of DT_DEBUG in the
         DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP entry.  This must come first because glibc
         only fills in DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP (not DT_DEBUG) and GDB only
         looks at the first one it sees.  */

and which obviously does not stand (anymore?) as far as GDB is concerned.  
I'll post a proposal to update it to match reality.  It is worth noting 
that current MIPS BFD always adds DT_DEBUG too (and always after 
DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP, the comment gets this part right).

 Anyway, I think `gdbserver' should be as liberal as to what it accepts as 
GDB itself is, so I have updated my change as below.  No changes in 
regression testing.

 Thanks for your input.  Any further comments?

2012-04-03  Maciej W. Rozycki  <macro@codesourcery.com>

	gdb/gdbserver/
	* linux-low.c (get_r_debug): Handle DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP.

  Maciej

gdb-gdbserver-rld-map.diff
Index: gdb-fsf-trunk-quilt/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
===================================================================
--- gdb-fsf-trunk-quilt.orig/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c	2012-04-03 16:49:32.000000000 +0100
+++ gdb-fsf-trunk-quilt/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c	2012-04-04 11:56:37.405566578 +0100
@@ -5419,7 +5419,9 @@ get_dynamic (const int pid, const int is
 }
 
 /* Return &_r_debug in the inferior, or -1 if not present.  Return value
-   can be 0 if the inferior does not yet have the library list initialized.  */
+   can be 0 if the inferior does not yet have the library list initialized.
+   We look for DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP first.  MIPS executables use this instead of
+   DT_DEBUG, although they sometimes contain an unused DT_DEBUG entry too.  */
 
 static CORE_ADDR
 get_r_debug (const int pid, const int is_elf64)
@@ -5427,19 +5429,35 @@ get_r_debug (const int pid, const int is
   CORE_ADDR dynamic_memaddr;
   const int dyn_size = is_elf64 ? sizeof (Elf64_Dyn) : sizeof (Elf32_Dyn);
   unsigned char buf[sizeof (Elf64_Dyn)];  /* The larger of the two.  */
+  CORE_ADDR map = -1;
 
   dynamic_memaddr = get_dynamic (pid, is_elf64);
   if (dynamic_memaddr == 0)
-    return (CORE_ADDR) -1;
+    return map;
 
   while (linux_read_memory (dynamic_memaddr, buf, dyn_size) == 0)
     {
       if (is_elf64)
 	{
 	  Elf64_Dyn *const dyn = (Elf64_Dyn *) buf;
+	  union
+	    {
+	      Elf64_Xword map;
+	      unsigned char buf[sizeof (Elf64_Xword)];
+	    }
+	  rld_map;
 
-	  if (dyn->d_tag == DT_DEBUG)
-	    return dyn->d_un.d_val;
+	  if (dyn->d_tag == DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP)
+	    {
+	      if (linux_read_memory (dyn->d_un.d_val,
+				     rld_map.buf, sizeof (rld_map.buf)) == 0)
+		return rld_map.map;
+	      else
+		break;
+	    }
+
+	  if (dyn->d_tag == DT_DEBUG && map == -1)
+	    map = dyn->d_un.d_val;
 
 	  if (dyn->d_tag == DT_NULL)
 	    break;
@@ -5447,9 +5465,24 @@ get_r_debug (const int pid, const int is
       else
 	{
 	  Elf32_Dyn *const dyn = (Elf32_Dyn *) buf;
+	  union
+	    {
+	      Elf32_Word map;
+	      unsigned char buf[sizeof (Elf32_Word)];
+	    }
+	  rld_map;
 
-	  if (dyn->d_tag == DT_DEBUG)
-	    return dyn->d_un.d_val;
+	  if (dyn->d_tag == DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP)
+	    {
+	      if (linux_read_memory (dyn->d_un.d_val,
+				     rld_map.buf, sizeof (rld_map.buf)) == 0)
+		return rld_map.map;
+	      else
+		break;
+	    }
+
+	  if (dyn->d_tag == DT_DEBUG && map == -1)
+	    map = dyn->d_un.d_val;
 
 	  if (dyn->d_tag == DT_NULL)
 	    break;
@@ -5458,7 +5491,7 @@ get_r_debug (const int pid, const int is
       dynamic_memaddr += dyn_size;
     }
 
-  return (CORE_ADDR) -1;
+  return map;
 }
 
 /* Read one pointer from MEMADDR in the inferior.  */


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]