This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [commit] Do not rely on FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS being zero


On 04/17/2012 03:01 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:57:11 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> > Nor with C getters and setters with opaque types.
> It is just too much coding, like here _LVAL, it is just borind this C++
> reimplementation in C, the standard is C++, why GDB has to call all the
> standard C++ constructs differently.


You're deeply confused if you think C++ invented getters/setters.

-- 
Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]