This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB/MI and ">" prompts
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Stan Shebs <stanshebs at earthlink dot net>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:09:07 +0300
- Subject: Re: GDB/MI and ">" prompts
- References: <83vckviv3b.fsf@gnu.org> <20120419154853.GM25623@adacore.com> <83sjfzitxx.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4vjitnj.fsf@gnu.org> <20120419185329.GO25623@adacore.com> <83mx67ikxm.fsf@gnu.org> <837gx7hhxa.fsf@gnu.org> <83lilg6ysn.fsf@gnu.org> <4F9EBD0D.2090701@earthlink.net>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:25:49 -0700
> From: Stan Shebs <stanshebs@earthlink.net>
>
> It seems logically correct... Did you try Eclipse? This is the kind of
> thing that CDT's MI and console bits can be sensitive to, even though
> it's not supposed to be. :-) If you haven't tried it, doing some
> breakpoint commands (both from breakpoint window and console window)
> with any recent released Eclipse should be a sufficient sniff test.
>
> If Eclipse is good, then this is OK to commit.
Thanks. No, I didn't try Eclipse, and I don't have it handy. Perhaps
someone else could.