This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Completion of add-inferior
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 23:56:15 +0300
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Completion of add-inferior
- References: <83pqaay5b3.fsf@gnu.org> <87txzmxye6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:20:49 -0600
>
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> Eli> 2012-05-11 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Eli> * inferior.c: Include completer.h
> Eli> (initialize_inferiors): Set completer of add-inferior to
> Eli> filename_completer.
>
> It isn't perhaps ideal, but it is better than the status quo, so ok.
Thanks for the review.
In what way is it not ideal? Did you want to complete on file names
only when -exec was used? I thought about that, but then I realized
that any other way of invoking that command cannot benefit from any
completion at all.
Or did you have something else in mind?